As an evolution theorist, I am interested in the why of intelligence. I find the "artificial" modifier arrogant. If something is intelligent, it is intelligent… period. When we say "yes but humans had to create it", we ignore our own construction.
No answer yet
Leave your Adderall at the door. This group is a no holds bared pit of chaos. Just what the AI doctor ordered. Come help us dig around in this dark and confounding landscape that is intelligence. What is it? What is its range? How can we work towards an abstraction that is both sharable and useful for the exploration and construction of experimentation environments? This isn't your grand daddy's meetup. Come get muddy and scuffed, it is always an adventure. Randall
You must be signed in to post a Greeting.
"Lacking any credible evidence that intelligence is different from computation we move on… So lets start by listing ways we already know computation is limited: 1. Incompleteness (a description can never fully describe itself). 2...."
"[I started this thread as a place to pre-discuss this meetup topic] Two names come up first and foremost when discussing the historical roots of the concept of "limits on intelligence": Kurt Godel and Alan Turing...."
"Anyone ever do the math to figure out the absolute minimum amount of energy (per payload mass) necessary to balance in 2 or 3 dimensions? Anyway… this Honda unicycle segway thingy (the "UX3…watch the video!")..."
"Study finds that people who are tasked with learning to categorize objects learn faster if supplied names for the categories...."
0
likes6
likes"Let's deconstruct your post: OK, I have to agree, not ALL friendly AI proponents are as simple to profile as my quip implies… but most are!..."
