All the puzzlers in the previously announced topic - "Mary's Room, the Chinese Room, Zombies, Bats, and Qualia" are already scheduled to be discussed by Bob Blum in his talk on 2/28/10 . My apologies for the confusion.
Note that the time for the meetup on 2/14 is noon, as with almost all AI meetups.
---
Instead we will debate the topic "Logic-based Infallible Godlike AI".
We'll debate what a logic based AI might be like. Things like how it would behave, what strengths and weaknesses it might have, and whether it could be outsmarted by lesser intelligences such as ourselves. We will also discuss whether these kinds of Intelligences are possible in the first place.
This will be informal. We will be lazy and only define our terms as needed, whenever someone asks for a definition. We'll describe a few different kinds of possible AIs and bracket a few levels of Infallibility. One important question is whether we believe these AIs will have control of nanoTechnology (nT) level devices. We'll discuss both possibilities. Another important issue is whether we think there will be one or many such AIs on our planet.
We'll start with simple and reasonably probable near-future AI systems and work our way up. I'd like to see a "Plausibility Path" for every kind/level of AI we decide to discuss: No miraculous steps in a path from where we are today. I realize this is very difficult but we're not doing this rigorously; this is for entertainment purposes (our own).
Full disclosure: I believe Logic-based Infallible Godlike AIs are impossible and/or useless; I have discussed this in an AI MeetUp. You can watch the video "Bizarre Systems" at http://videos.syntien... if you missed it and would like to catch up.
If this gets boring we'll discuss something else.
This last meetup or meatup, as some may see it, superficially may have seemed entangled, short sided and confusing; but underneath this, I felt was a definite desire to air our differences and build. It was my goal to not be narrowed by any need to simply just get along. And obviously, getting along didn?t get in my way! However, it concerns me that the need of those who expect an end to chaos to come to them without any contribution of there own, will be sitting in their desert a long time.
It also concerns me that some bring nothing to the table but an expectation of entertainment. Where does one go that these kinds of expectations are met? Add nothing get entertained. When anything is constructed, it doesn?t start with the most beautiful, elegant and rational first At this stage of the game, if you don?t come to build than go to a movie. This is not to say that I among others didn?t need to work on their com skills. OK that one is a given.
http://www.ai-meetup.org/messages/boards/thread/8587207/#...![]()
![]()
The disconnect between the ideas of logic and infallability are well-worn topics in theology and anti-theology, at least as far back as Aquinas & Anselm - here's a recent salvo in that perpetual argument: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YYVPGwk0ac
