The Meetup Groups shown here are topically similar to Bay Area Artificial Intelligence Meetup Group.
Groups are more likely to be displayed here if they:
- have a Meetup scheduled
- have a high rating
- have a group photo
- are "public" and not "private"
- have shown they are likely to stick around (older than 30 days)
Talk about this Meetup
You must be a member to post a comment. Join or login.
What is thought? What is creativity? How are they related? Are they related?
What are the processes of decisions?
Q: Who can give me a ride down from SF?
I like Monica's original idea of HER asking the questions. Some of the members seem to be rebelling against this idea. :-)
Q: What percentage of this meetup's members have an active interest in the suppression of the possibility of success in the field of AI?
Q: Does extreme passion for a domain (AI for instance) work in favor of or against success?
Q: Is there any reason to believe that membership in this meetup will contribute to the likelihood of success of your own AI research?
Q: If you had unlimited funds, how would you spend them in the pursuit of working AI? How does this differ from the research you do in the absence of funding?
Q: What are the significant differences between the excitement/responsibilities a parent feels when rearing a child and the way AI researchers feel when preparing experiments and constructions?
Q: From which domain is success in AI most likely? AI specific research? Robotics? Neurology? Cognitive Science? Linguistics? Mathematics? Game Theory? Thermodynamics? Evolution Theory? Game Development / Entertainment? Logic? Philosophy? Psychology? Systems Theory? Chaos Theory? Physics? Bistro Math?
Q: Will the existence of a self evolving super-intelligence compress time such that slower thinkers (humans) become utterly insignificant?
Q: Assuming a superior intelligence sharing Earth with us, what will humans accomplish that they might not otherwise have done, and in what pursuits will they loose interest?
Q: Are there multiple opportunities to succeed in the field of AI, or will the first success make all subsequent research moot?
Q: Which of the AI projects you have read of or seen demonstrated seem especially promising? which seem doomed to failure? Why?
Q: As in horror and mystery genres, the predictive narration found in science fiction and fantasy has a tendency to play to the deepest and most pervasive of human fears. As an audience, we seem especially attuned and attracted to stories that involve the construction of things otherwise derived from "nature"? Frankenstein's monster and all of its variants. Is this reaction a warning against our tendency towards over-valuing our own powers, or against the wisdom of actually building "life".
Q: Has public reticence significantly hampered the development of AI? How does the ever-increasing diffusion of science-informed technology into the daily lives of the average global citizen effect public acceptance of (possibly superior) artificial beings?
Q: What is the thermodynamics of thought? What describes the least energy cascade of physical neurological events from which human intelligence precipitates, emerges, or is evidence of? Is anyone attempting to build AI from the perspective of a self-evolving, least energy optimizing, thermodynamic system?
Q: Are there real causal boundaries limiting intelligence? How close is human intelligence to this theoretical asymptote? Is there something beyond intelligence that is as much superior to intelligence as intelligence is to, say, reproduction.
Q: Have we already discovered the essential structure of intelligence? leaving only the task (however daunting) of application?
Q: Will there ever be a science supporting the study of intelligence? Will it be possible to describe intelligence within the exact ontological taxonomy of units and transforms such that measurements can be taken, mathematical equations applied, and predictions falsified?
Delete this comment?
This comment has been deleted.